Agile vs. Traditional Project Management in Life Sciences: Choosing the Right Approach

Charles H. Paul
Instructor: Charles H. Paul
Date: Monday April 21, 2025
Time:

10:00 AM PDT | 01:00 PM EDT

Duration: 60 Minutes
Webinar Id: 606454

Price Details

Live Webinar
$150. One Attendee
$290. Unlimited Attendees
Recorded Webinar
$190. One Attendee
$390. Unlimited Attendees
Combo Offers   (Live + Recorded)
$289 $340   One Attendee
$599 $680   Unlimited Attendees

Unlimited Attendees: Any number of participants

Recorded Version: Unlimited viewing for 6 months (Access information will be emailed 24 hours after the completion of live webinar)

Overview:

This 60-minute webinar explores the key differences between Agile and Traditional (Waterfall) Project Management in the life sciences industry, helping professionals determine the best approach for their specific projects

It covers the structured, compliance-driven nature of traditional project management and the flexibility of Agile methodologies, highlighting their respective pros, cons, and real-world applications in areas such as clinical trials, regulatory submissions, R&D, and digital health projects. Participants will gain insights into when to use each approach, key decision-making factors, and hybrid models that balance regulatory requirements with innovation. 

The session concludes with case studies, best practices, and a live Q&A, ensuring attendees leave with practical knowledge to optimize their project management strategies in life sciences.

Why you should Attend:

Participants should attend this training to gain a comprehensive understanding of Agile and Traditional (Waterfall) Project Management and how each approach applies to the unique challenges of the life sciences industry. This webinar provides practical insights into selecting the right methodology based on regulatory requirements, project complexity, and business objectives

Attendees will explore real-world case studies, industry best practices, and decision-making frameworks to optimize project success in areas such as clinical trials, regulatory submissions, and R&D initiatives. Whether they are new to project management or experienced professionals looking to refine their approach, this session will equip them with the knowledge and tools needed to improve efficiency, compliance, and adaptability in their projects.

Areas Covered in the Session:

  • Introduction (10 minutes)
    • Welcome & Speaker Introduction (2 min)
      • Brief introduction of the presenter
      • Webinar objectives and key takeaways
    • Importance of Project Management in Life Sciences (3 min)
      • Challenges in life sciences projects (e.g., regulatory compliance, risk management, innovation cycles)
      • Why choosing the right project management approach is critical
    • Overview of Project Management Approaches (5 min)
      • Traditional (Waterfall) vs. Agile – fundamental differences
      • Evolution of project management in life sciences
  • Traditional (Waterfall) Project Management in Life Sciences (15 minutes)
    • Key Characteristics & Phases (5 min)
      • Sequential and structured methodology (Initiation, Planning, Execution, Monitoring, Closure)
      • Predictability, documentation, and regulatory alignment
    • Pros & Cons of Traditional PM in Life Sciences (5 min)
      • Pros: Clear structure, risk mitigation, compliance-friendly
      • Cons: Less flexibility, longer cycle times, potential inefficiencies
    • Use Cases in Life Sciences (5 min)
      • Clinical trials, regulatory submissions, manufacturing process validations
  • Agile Project Management in Life Sciences (15 minutes)
    • Key Characteristics & Principles (5 min)
      • Iterative, incremental, and collaborative approach
      • Agile frameworks (Scrum, Kanban, SAFe)
      • Adaptability in fast-changing environments
    • Pros & Cons of Agile in Life Sciences (5 min)
      • Pros: Flexibility, faster feedback loops, adaptability to changing regulations
      • Cons: Regulatory challenges, documentation concerns, team training requirements
    • Use Cases in Life Sciences (5 min)
      • R&D projects, software development for medical devices, digital health initiatives
  • Choosing the Right Approach: Factors & Decision-Making (15 minutes)
    • Key Decision Criteria (5 min)
      • Regulatory constraints
      • Project complexity and risk level
      • Stakeholder involvement and collaboration needs
      • Product lifecycle considerations
  • Hybrid Approaches: Best of Both Worlds? (5 min)
    • When and how to combine Agile and Traditional methods
    • Examples of hybrid models in regulated environments
  • Case Studies & Real-World Applications (5 min)
    • Case study comparisons: Agile vs. Traditional in life sciences projects

Who Will Benefit:

  • Project Managers
  • Regulatory Affairs Specialists
  • Clinical Research Associates (CRAs)
  • Quality Assurance (QA) Managers
  • Research & Development (R&D) Managers
  • Medical Device Engineers
  • Pharmaceutical Scientists
  • Compliance Officers
  • Manufacturing Managers
  • Operations Managers
  • Software Development Leads (MedTech & Life Sciences)
  • Process Improvement Specialists
  • Supply Chain Managers
  • Product Development Managers
  • Clinical Trial Managers
  • Risk Management Specialists
  • Validation Engineers
  • GMP Compliance Officers
  • Medical Writers
  • Technology & Digital Transformation Leaders

Speaker Profile
Charles H. Paul is the President of C. H. Paul Consulting, Inc. – a regulatory, manufacturing, training, and technical documentation consulting firm – celebrating its twentieth year in business in 2017. Charles has been a regulatory and management consultant and an Instructional Technologist for 30 years and has published numerous white papers on various regulatory and training subjects. The firm works with both domestic and international clients designing solutions for complex training and documentation issues.

He has held senior positions in consulting and in corporate training development prior to forming C. H. Paul Consulting, Inc.. He also worked for several years in government contracting managing the development of significant Army-wide training development contracts impacting virtually all of the active Army and changing the training paradigm throughout the military.

He has dedicated his entire professional career explaining the benefits of performance-based training

Sign Up for Our Newsletter